The Unprepared Mind
Before a soldier sets foot in a combat zone, they undergo months of psychological conditioning. Boot camp strips away civilian instincts and replaces them with discipline, unit cohesion, and mental frameworks designed to process violence. The military invests heavily in preparing the mind for war because it understands that the mind is what breaks first.
Civilian contractors receive no such preparation.
Consider a man we'll call David, a network administrator from Houston. David spent fifteen years troubleshooting servers in climate-controlled offices before a defense contractor offered him triple his salary to do the same work on a forward operating base in Afghanistan. His pre-deployment training consisted of a three-day orientation covering badge protocols, dress codes, and where to find the dining facility. No one taught him what to do when rockets started falling.
For eighteen months, David lived through mortar attacks, base incursions, and the constant threat of violence. He watched a colleague die in an explosion. He learned to sleep through distant gunfire. And when his contract ended, he flew home to Texas, hugged his wife, and assumed the worst was behind him.
The mortar rounds that fell on David's base did not distinguish between the uniformed soldiers and the civilian IT worker. The trauma did not check anyone's employment status before it took root. But David's mind, a civilian mind, untrained and unarmored, had no framework for what it had absorbed.
For the first six months back in Houston, David seemed fine. He returned to a stateside IT job. He coached his son's baseball team. He told himself the war was over.
Then the nightmares started. He began waking at 3 a.m., drenched in sweat, certain he had heard an explosion. He found himself unable to sit with his back to a door. A car backfiring in a parking lot sent him diving behind his vehicle. His wife said he had become a stranger, angry, distant, and unreachable.
David was experiencing delayed onset PTSD, a form of the condition where symptoms do not manifest until months or even years after the traumatic event. This is not uncommon. The mind can suppress trauma for extended periods before the dam finally breaks.
For Defense Base Act claimants, this delay creates a legal trap. The DBA imposes strict deadlines for reporting injuries and filing claims. Insurance companies know these deadlines intimately, and they use them as weapons. When David finally sought help, nearly two years after returning home, the insurance carrier argued that he had waited too long to file. They claimed his window had closed. The trauma was real, but according to the insurer, it was also too late to matter.
A broken femur shows up on an X-ray. A torn rotator cuff appears on an MRI. These injuries are visible, measurable, and difficult to dispute.
PTSD lives in the brain. It cannot be photographed. It does not appear on a scan. And this invisibility makes it profoundly difficult to prove in a legal proceeding.
When a psychiatrist diagnoses PTSD, that diagnosis is a clinical judgment based on reported symptoms, behavioral observations, and standardized assessments. It is not a laboratory result. Insurance companies exploit this distinction relentlessly. They hire their own psychiatric experts, doctors who have built careers testifying that claimants are exaggerating, malingering, or simply not as sick as they claim.
The burden falls on the injured worker to prove a causal link between their current mental state and a specific event that occurred in a war zone years earlier. This requires documentation that most workers never thought to keep. Did David write down the date of every rocket attack? Did he photograph the aftermath of the explosion that killed his colleague? Did he keep a journal of his emotional state? Of course not. He was trying to survive. Now, years later, that lack of documentation becomes the insurance company's best defense.
If proving PTSD is difficult, disproving the insurance company's alternative theories is even harder.
When David filed his claim, the insurer's investigators went to work, not on his time in Afghanistan, but on his entire life before it. They subpoenaed his divorce records from a marriage that ended a decade earlier. They obtained his college transcripts. They dug through old medical files looking for any mention of anxiety, depression, or counseling.
Their goal was simple: find another explanation for David's condition.
The argument they constructed was cynical but effective. David wasn't suffering because he watched a man die in a war zone, they claimed. He was depressed because of his divorce ten years ago. He had anxiety because of stress in a previous job. The war, according to the insurance company, was incidental, a convenient scapegoat for problems that predated his deployment.
This "pre-existing condition" defense shifts the burden back onto the worker, forcing them to prove that the war was the primary cause of their suffering rather than merely a contributing factor. It is an argument designed to muddy the waters just enough to give an administrative law judge a reason to deny the claim.
Veterans returning from combat have access to a community that understands them. VFW halls, American Legion posts, unit reunions, and veteran service organizations provide spaces where former soldiers can speak openly about their experiences with people who have lived through the same thing. This community is not a cure for PTSD, but it is a lifeline.
Civilian contractors have no such community.
David returned to a neighborhood where no one knew he had been in a war zone. His coworkers at his new job had no frame of reference for what he had experienced. He had no unit to reunite with, no shared history with fellow survivors. His isolation was total, and isolation feeds the darkness that PTSD creates.
Worse still, many contractors actively hide their symptoms. The defense contracting world is small, and a reputation for mental health problems can end a career. Admitting to PTSD can mean losing a security clearance, which means losing the ability to work overseas, which means losing access to the high salaries that drew many contractors into the field in the first place. The financial incentive to stay silent is enormous, and silence allows the condition to fester.
For workers like David, navigating the Defense Base Act claims process while battling PTSD is an impossible burden. The system demands documentation, deadlines, and legal arguments at precisely the moment when the injured worker is least capable of providing them.
This is why experienced legal representation is not a luxury, it is a necessity. An attorney who understands Defense Base Act claims can fight back against delayed-filing arguments, counter the insurance company's hired psychiatric experts, and dismantle the "pre-existing condition" defense with evidence and expert testimony.
For contractors who deployed from or returned to the Lone Star State, Texas Defense Base Act lawyers who specialize in these claims understand both the federal law and the unique challenges that PTSD cases present. David eventually found such an attorney. It took two years of litigation, but his claim was approved. He finally received coverage for the psychiatric treatment he needed.
He should not have had to fight a legal battle while fighting for his own sanity. But until the system changes, injured contractors need advocates who understand that invisible wounds are still wounds.
The military has made significant strides in recent years in destigmatizing PTSD and providing mental health resources to returning soldiers. The private sector has not kept pace. Civilian contractors remain in the shadows, unrecognized, unsupported, and often abandoned by the very system that was supposed to protect them.
These workers are casualties of war. The trauma they carry is no less real because they wore a polo shirt instead of a uniform. The nightmares are no less vivid. The broken marriages are no less painful. The legal system, and the insurance industry that operates within it, must catch up to the reality of modern psychological injury.
David answered his country's call. He deserves a system that acknowledges his sacrifice, not one that searches his past for reasons to deny it.
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Want to add a comment?
