Talent knows no borders, but bureaucracy certainly does. For companies looking to scale, the search for the perfect candidate often extends beyond their home country. Similarly, ambitious professionals frequently look abroad for career-defining opportunities. The bridge between these two desires is the work visa—a critical legal document that grants a foreign national the right to work in a specific country for a specific period.
Perhaps the most pervasive myth is that a signed employment contract is the golden ticket to a work visa. Many assume that if a company is willing to hire a foreign national, the government will automatically approve the request.
In reality, a job offer is merely the prerequisite to apply, not a guarantee of approval. Most countries operate under strict "labor market testing" or protectionist policies designed to prioritize local workers. Governments generally require the employer to prove that they could not find a qualified local citizen or permanent resident to fill the role before they can sponsor a foreign worker.
Furthermore, the job itself must meet specific criteria. In the United States, for example, the H-1B visa requires the role to be a "specialty occupation" requiring at least a bachelor’s degree in a specific field. If the job description is too generic or the salary offered is below the prevailing wage for that region, the visa will be denied regardless of how badly the company wants the candidate. Eligibility is a three-way match between the candidate's credentials, the job’s complexity, and the employer’s ability to pay—if one leg fails, the whole application falls.
"We’ll just fill out the forms and send them in." This attitude is a recipe for delay and denial. Both employers and employees often view the visa process as a simple administrative hurdle, akin to renewing a driver’s license. They assume it involves downloading a PDF, filling in some personal details, and waiting a few weeks.
The reality is a rigorous legal process that often involves multiple government agencies. For a single visa, an employer might need to file with a labor department to certify wages, a citizenship service to petition for the worker, and a consulate to issue the actual visa stamp. Each step has its own processing times, fees, and evidence requirements.
A single error—a misspelled name, a checked box in the wrong column, or a salary calculation off by a few dollars—can lead to an immediate rejection or a "Request for Evidence" (RFE) that stalls hiring for months. Because the margin for error is so slim, this is rarely a DIY project. Engaging an experienced immigration lawyer in Salt Lake City is usually necessary to navigate the changing currents of immigration policy and ensure that the petition is airtight before it ever reaches a government official's desk.
There is a sense of relief when a visa is finally approved. The employee arrives, starts work, and everyone assumes the hard part is over. This leads to the dangerous misconception that a work visa is a permanent status.
Work visas are inherently temporary. They come with strict expiration dates, often ranging from one to three years. While many visas are renewable, renewal is never automatic. The employer must typically prove that the job still exists, the salary still meets current standards, and the employee is still eligible.
Moreover, "status" and "visa" are different things. The visa is the entry document in the passport; status is the legal permission to remain in the country. If an employee travels abroad while their visa stamp is expired—even if their work status is valid—they may be denied re-entry.
Employers must track these dates religiously. A lapse in status doesn't just mean the employee has to stop working; it can render them "out of status," leading to potential deportation and bans on future re-entry. Managing a foreign workforce requires a long-term calendar of expirations and renewal windows.
Employees often believe that once they secure a work visa, it belongs to them personally. They assume that if they find a better job with a competitor, they can simply hand in their two weeks' notice and transfer their visa to the new company on Monday morning.
This is rarely the case. Most work visas are "employer-specific." The legal permission to work is tied directly to the entity that sponsored the petition. If the employee quits or is terminated, their legal status often ends immediately or after a very short grace period (often 60 days).
To switch jobs, the new employer usually has to file a completely new petition. This means proving eligibility all over again, paying new fees, and facing new scrutiny. While some jurisdictions allow for "portability" (starting work while the new petition is pending), the employee is essentially tethered to their sponsor. This dynamic creates a significant retention tool for employers, but can be a rude awakening for employees who think they have the same mobility as local workers.
When a professional relocates their life across the world, they usually expect their spouse and children to join them seamlessly. While most work visa categories do allow for dependent visas, the rights associated with those visas are often misunderstood.
The primary shock for many expatriate families is the "trailing spouse" issue. In many countries, holding a dependent visa gives the spouse the right to live in the country, but not the right to work. They may be barred from employment entirely unless they qualify for their own separate work visa, which brings them back to square one of the eligibility process.
This can result in a significant drop in household income and career stalls for the accompanying partner. Additionally, "children" are defined strictly by age. In many systems, once a child turns 21, they "age out" of dependent status and must find their own visa path or leave the country. Employers and employees need to have frank discussions about what relocation looks like for the entire family unit, not just the principal worker.
The gap between expectation and reality is where most failures occur. By understanding that visas are temporary, tied to specific employers, and subject to rigorous scrutiny, both parties can manage expectations better. Whether you are building a global team or building a life in a new country, the best approach is one of caution, preparation, and professional counsel. Treating immigration compliance as a strategic priority rather than a paperwork task is the only way to ensure the journey is worth the effort.
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Want to add a comment?
