The big moments of leadership get all the attention. The strategic pivot announced to the board. The crisis skillfully navigated. The inspiring vision cast at the company meeting. These are the scenes that show up in case studies and LinkedIn posts. But they're not where leadership is actually forged.
Leadership crystallizes on Tuesday mornings. In the routine team check-in where someone shares a problem. In the hallway conversation about a project that's stalled. In the decision about whether to address the tension that's been building between two team members or let it slide one more day. These are the moments that reveal whether someone has internalized what it means to lead or whether they're just performing leadership during the highlights.
There's nothing magical about Tuesday specifically, except that it represents the middle of things. Not the fresh start of Monday, not the anticipation of Friday, not the high-stakes moment that everyone recognizes as important. Tuesday morning is when the shine of enthusiasm has worn off but the reward of completion still feels distant.
This is when emerging leaders face their real test. They're tired. The work feels repetitive. The problems are familiar rather than novel. Nobody is watching closely. There's no audience to perform for, no recognition waiting at the finish line. Just the daily work of helping a team function effectively.
Leaders who only show up for the big moments create teams that struggle in their absence. Their people become dependent on those occasional bursts of inspiration and direction but lack the steady guidance needed for sustained performance. The teams might rally for a product launch or important presentation, but they drift during the long stretches between these milestones.
Traditional development often focuses on competencies that sound impressive. Strategic thinking. Change management. Executive presence. These matter, but they're not what most emerging leaders struggle with day to day.
What they actually need is the discipline to hold a regular one-on-one even when they're swamped. The patience to let someone work through their own solution rather than jumping in with the answer. The courage to address small performance issues before they become large ones. The consistency to follow through on commitments even when something more interesting competes for attention.
These capabilities sound simple, perhaps even obvious. But they're remarkably difficult to sustain. They require prioritizing long-term team health over short-term individual productivity. They demand present attention when your mind is pulled toward the urgent matter waiting in your inbox. They ask you to invest in others' development when your own workload feels overwhelming.
Leadership programs that focus only on high-level competencies without addressing these foundational disciplines produce leaders who can deliver impressive presentations but struggle to build functional teams.
The Tuesday morning test ultimately reveals whether someone has internalized leadership or is merely performing it. Performance requires an audience and rises to meet important occasions. Internalization persists regardless of who's watching and shows up even when the moment seems insignificant.
This distinction matters because organizations need leaders who can maintain team effectiveness through all conditions, not just during the exciting phases. They need people who find fulfillment in steady team development, not just in visible achievements.
For emerging leaders themselves, passing the Tuesday morning test means they've reached a milestone in their development. They're no longer motivated primarily by external recognition or the thrill of new challenges. They've found satisfaction in the daily work of helping others succeed. That's when leadership stops being something you do occasionally and becomes something you are.
Want to add a comment?