Live blackjack table last week offered Perfect Pairs and 21+3 side bets. Dealer kept announcing other players' side bet wins—$125 here, $80 there. Looked profitable.
Decided to test it properly. Spent a month playing live dealer blackjack and baccarat, half the sessions with side bets, half without. Tracked every hand, every result, every dollar.
The side bets cost me way more than expected.
Before testing side bet costs, choose your platform wisely. BetAndPlay lets you play online pokies with AU$20 minimum deposits and $5,500 welcome packages—enough bankroll to properly track side bet expenses versus standard play.
Perfect Pairs pays 25:1 for suited pairs. 21+3 pays 100:1 for suited three-of-a-kind. Dragon Bonus in baccarat pays up to 30:1 for big winning margins.
The payouts look incredible compared to standard even-money blackjack or baccarat wins. One $5 side bet hitting 25:1 returns $125—equal to winning five main hands.
That math seems compelling until you track how often these bets actually hit versus how much you're spending on them.
Played 16 live dealer sessions over four weeks. Eight sessions with side bets ($5 per hand), eight without.
Sessions with side bets:
Total hands played: 412
Side bets placed: 412 ($2,060 wagered on side bets alone)
Side bet wins: 31 hits
Total side bet return: $715
Net loss on side bets: $1,345
Sessions without side bets:
Total hands played: 438
Main bet results: down $280 from normal house edge
The side bets added an extra $1,345 in losses on top of regular play. That's brutal.
The house edge on Perfect Pairs is roughly 6%. On 21+3 it's around 3-4%. Compare that to blackjack's 0.5% edge with basic strategy.
You're paying 6-12x more house edge for the chance at bigger payouts. The math doesn't balance even when you hit.
I won 31 side bets out of 412 attempts (7.5% hit rate). Average payout when winning: $23. But I was betting $5 per hand, so I spent $2,060 to win back $715.
The occasional 25:1 hit felt great momentarily. Then I'd realize I'd lost the previous 40 side bets trying to hit it again.
Side bets changed how I played the main game. Found myself paying less attention to basic strategy because I was tracking whether my cards made pairs or matched the dealer's upcard.
Made basic strategy mistakes three times in side bet sessions that I caught afterward watching recordings. Never made those errors in sessions without side bets where my full focus stayed on optimal play.
Those strategy errors cost an estimated $45 across the month—a secondary cost beyond the side bet losses themselves.
Had one hand where Perfect Pairs paid 25:1 on a $5 bet. Won $125 on the side bet while also winning the main $10 hand. Total win: $145 on one hand.
That single hand made me feel like the side bets were working. Ignored that I'd lost the previous 53 side bets ($265) trying to hit it.
The big wins create powerful positive reinforcement that overshadows the steady drain. Your brain remembers the $125 hit, forgets the forty $5 losses surrounding it.
Had four "big" side bet wins during the month (20:1 or better). They felt significant in the moment but collectively returned $380 while I'd spent $2,060 total on side bets.
Dragon Bonus side bet in baccarat has even higher house edge—around 9.4% on the banker bet version.
Tried this for four sessions. Placed Dragon Bonus on every hand at $5.
Result: 198 hands played, 14 side bet wins, $285 returned from side bets, $990 total spent. Lost $705 on side bets alone.
The worst part? The side bets made me play longer because I kept thinking "next hand might be the big Dragon Bonus." Played 30% more hands in sessions with side bets versus without.
That extended play meant more exposure to the main game's house edge too. Lost $145 on main bets during those sessions versus $95 average in sessions without side bets.
Live dealers announce every side bet win loudly. "Perfect Pairs! Suited pairs pays 25 to 1!"
They don't announce the losses. You just watch your chips disappear silently hand after hand.
This creates perception bias. You hear about wins constantly, your losses happen quietly. Makes side bets seem more successful than they are.
Counted dealer announcements during one 90-minute session: announced side bet wins 8 times. Never mentioned the 83 losing side bets that happened simultaneously.
This transparency gap varies across platforms. Many new crypto casinos display real-time statistics showing side bet hit rates and house edges directly on screen, letting players see actual percentages rather than relying on selective dealer announcements.
Some players argue side bets add excitement even if they lose money. Fair point—entertainment has value.
Slots deliver that excitement differently. Games like legacy of dead build tension through bonus rounds and free spins rather than side wagers, typically carrying better RTP than Perfect Pairs or Dragon Bonus options. The thrill comes from gameplay features instead of auxiliary bets.
But I found the excitement turned to frustration quickly. After losing 15 straight side bets, the game felt more annoying than entertaining.
The disappointment of watching another hand not make a pair or flush outweighed the brief thrill when one finally hit.
Sessions without side bets felt more relaxing. Just playing solid blackjack, making good decisions, accepting results without the constant side bet disappointment.
Month totals with $200 per session budget:
Eight sessions with side bets: Lost $1,625 total, average 72 minutes per session.
Eight sessions without side bets: Lost $280 total, average 85 minutes per session.
Side bets increased my losses by nearly 6x while making sessions slightly shorter because I busted faster.
The "excitement" of side bets cost me $1,345 that month. Not worth it for me, but if those occasional 25:1 hits are worth paying 6% house edge for, at least know what you're buying.
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Supriyo Khan
Want to add a comment?
